from what I understand, John is describing a more granular view on the "scope of work mandate" (the vertical axis of the Org Topologies map).
the OT map also defines horizontally the "scope of skills mandate". we believe this is critical to get the full picture. as people/teams/agents are (dis)allowed to apply certain skills.
from what I understand, John is describing a more granular view on the "scope of work mandate" (the vertical axis of the Org Topologies map).
the OT map also defines horizontally the "scope of skills mandate". we believe this is critical to get the full picture. as people/teams/agents are (dis)allowed to apply certain skills.
both mandates are someone's decision (we call it org design) and we work with organizations to 1) get the awareness of these mandates; 2) purposefully re-define them; 3) develop a multi-year org development direction (i.e. from CAPS-2 to PART-4 on the map).
from what I understand, John is describing a more granular view on the "scope of work mandate" (the vertical axis of the Org Topologies map).
the OT map also defines horizontally the "scope of skills mandate". we believe this is critical to get the full picture. as people/teams/agents are (dis)allowed to apply certain skills.
both mandates are someone's decision (we call it org design) and we work with organizations to 1) get the awareness of these mandates; 2) purposefully re-define them; 3) develop a multi-year org development direction (i.e. from CAPS-2 to PART-4 on the map).
see https://www.orgtopologies.com/ for more on the map & mapping method.