3 Comments
User's avatar
Simone Cicero's avatar

Thanks John for this precious reflection. I think it's fascinating to seek a balance between a certain level of shared semantics, and the diversity that can flourish on top. The question i'm really treying to grapple with is what does it make sense to stasndardize and is it intellectyally honest to provide affordances (such as a definition of what a product unit is, how it connects with others, how they combine into experiences, respond to customer needs... and down to how they connect with teams and capabilities...?)

Expand full comment
Joachim Sammer's avatar

This is one for the weekend. I am having a nomenclature phase - have you considered aligning your usage of the terms outcome and impact with Outcomes over Output? Activity - Output- Outcome - Impact. Based on the value exchange.

Expand full comment
Cei's avatar

I love the connecting dots phrase, I actually have a lightning talk based on this idea and submitted to a few conferences to talk on it. It’s such a powerful mental model.

Expand full comment