I see this as a natural compression pattern. When PM roles are more scarce, they will skew more senior due to the higher "per capita" leverage & scope these roles will have. It does imply that early career PMs are being developed elsewhere - which is likely an anti-pattern. I also see this pattern correcting itself over time as companies…
I see this as a natural compression pattern. When PM roles are more scarce, they will skew more senior due to the higher "per capita" leverage & scope these roles will have. It does imply that early career PMs are being developed elsewhere - which is likely an anti-pattern. I also see this pattern correcting itself over time as companies increasingly encounter the natural limitations of "fewer, more senior" PMs.
I see this as a natural compression pattern. When PM roles are more scarce, they will skew more senior due to the higher "per capita" leverage & scope these roles will have. It does imply that early career PMs are being developed elsewhere - which is likely an anti-pattern. I also see this pattern correcting itself over time as companies increasingly encounter the natural limitations of "fewer, more senior" PMs.