10 Comments

When you say, "admitting OKRs aren't working..." do you mean some particular metrics?

Expand full comment

This is such a beautiful piece that no one talks about often John. Sharing with my product and design team.

Expand full comment

I like the idea of substractive, for example: careful practicing of minimalistic life styles would make our life lot more lighter - that includes our thoughts

Expand full comment

It's like earning more money and finding yourself adding new useless stuff into your house (and into your life).

Such a simple realization that often "less is more" and yet with such a profound impact. John, you just blew my mind with this one.

Expand full comment

There is a proven cognitive bias at work here, that when presented with a situation, process, idea, object etc. that requires improvement people tend to come up with additive rather than subtractive solutions. There’s was a really interesting paper published on it Nature back in 2021 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03380-y

Expand full comment

There's some research which backs this: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/04/brains-prefer-adding-sustainability/

Also, not sure if you saw Bob Sutton's brilliant article talking about similar themes: https://www.wsj.com/articles/bosses-staff-employees-less-work-11663790432

Expand full comment

Love it. We do seem to have a neurological blindspot to subtractive change. The best part is no part. The best step is no step.

Expand full comment

I really like the analogy of pruning in terms of its role in growth.

I think typical incentive structures at organizations more easily reward additive changes over subtractive changes. Additive changes are seen, subtractive changes are felt. As a result, we naturally bias towards the visible and apparent... and worse, performative changes.

A balanced plate of the two feels like the right aspiration to work with, especially for leaders who *should* be able to look past the optics.

Expand full comment